Search for: "Garcia v. Pfizer Inc" Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 908 P.2d 1095, 1104 (Colo. 1995); Garcia v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
Pfizer Inc., 58 A.D.3d 138, 141 (N.Y. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 11:38 am
Pfizer, Inc., 2004 WL 2191804, *4 & n.4 (S.D. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
A futuristic Neil imagines a time when consumers’ psychological/neurological associations could be measured (also) for the sake of assess a trade marks’ reputation* Case management decisions in the Lyrica caseThe ongoing case between Warner-Lambert (a subsidiary of Pfizer) and Actavis concerning pregabalin (sold by Pfizer under the trade mark Lyrica, and by Actavis under the trade mark Lecaent) seems set to be the case of the year, Darren says. [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:00 am
Abbott Labs, Inc., 444 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 2006), and Melder v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 11:22 pm
In so doing, Doria came down firmly on what we consider to be the correct side of what we'll call the Garcia/Desiano divide.Both Garcia v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
Pfizer Inc., 358 F.3d 659, 661 (9th Cir. 2004) (same; physician considered warning inappropriate) (applying California law).Under these facts, if Conte were an ordinary prescription drug product liability case, plaintiff would have been out of court and out of luck, just like Motus. [read post]